About Me

Name:Lee Culpepper
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

www.leeculpepper.com

For my most recent posts, visit <www.leeculpepper.com>.

Thanks for your support.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is a Hero?

There are many heroes in this world, but the word “hero” itself has become a hackneyed label. Time and again it is circumstance that brings out an individual’s heroic qualities. Our military members who are serving our country and fighting for the freedom of people in a foreign land are undeniably heroes.

Frequently, many heroes pay the ultimate price while serving others, such as the brave firemen, policemen, and civilians who sacrificed their lives trying to save the victims of 9/11. For the heroes who survive their crucibles, they tend to continue serving with a degree of humility and meekness. How many heroes do we know that flaunt themselves as such? Heroes are modest, truthful, loyal, and selfless.

Read Article…
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

POW Bud Day

I received this email today concerning POW Bud Day's opinions about McCain.


Hi Lee,
Thanks for your informative article. Like you I have no admiration for
John McCain as far him being President is concerned. He is too arrogant
and not someone I would think to be qualified to work diplomatically
with other nations. He is also an unforgiving person especially in light
of the comment he made about Viet Nam people in general calling them
"gooks". Hardly presidential material. However, I can easily
understand his anger for these people but by the same token he is not
fit to serve as a commander and chief. To me that would be like putting
a loose canon in the White House. We certainly don't need that.
Having revealed what is commonly known about the man, I have the utmost
respect for him because he is indeed a patriot. I know this not from his
autobiography but by reading a not too well publicized book written by a
man named Bud Day. The name of the book is "American Patriot". Bud
met McCain as a POW both of which endured humongous treatment received
during their service in Viet Nam. The book goes into fairly good
detail of the events they shared together as well as describing what he
thought of McCain as a man. Although Bud has deep respect for McCain and
still considers him a friend he doesn't have that much admiration for
him from behavior standpoint. Bud Day is a Christian and followed
Christian principles. I believe that through these principles it enabled him
to survive Viet Nam. His life was definitely spared to serve the Lord
for future purposes by way of doing humanitarian work as well as heading
up the initiative for the US government to provide complete medical
coverage for life for all military personnel who were former POWs.
Through Bud Day's autobiography I came away with the impression of two
different contrasts of individuals who endured very similar circumstances
together but their objectives in life were completely different. John
McCain
was tough as nails and would not give in to the enemy but the
anger he holds inside will not be better served by leading a nation as
President. I have provided you a link of additional information you can
read on Bud Day. Thank you for your work as a columnist. ------
Pete/-CA
http://www.historynet.com/wars_conflicts/vietnam_war/7276666.html?page=1&c=y
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John McCain's War Record

McCain's war record: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy18WvvGq3I&feature=relate
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

POW Information

I received the following email from POW Warrior on Saturday.

<powwarrior@gmail.com>
______________________________________________________
Dear All:
 
The POW/MIA Issue is obviously not a campaign issue yet, the American people need to know what John McCain, who regularly reminds us of his former POW status, has done in his political life as a fullfledged enemy of the POW/MIA Issue whenever possible. (Read below) 
 
 
Below you have the primary reasons why we, the POW/MIA Families,  are against John McCain.  Think about it - If POW/MIA Families do NOT support John McCain - What should that be telling the American voters about John McCain?

Since his return from Hanoi, McCain has …

~Ignored pleas of POW/MIA Family Members for his political influence in the overall POW/MIA Issue as well as with their individual cases

~Verbally abused POW/MIA Family Members in public and private

~Attempted to negatively influence those who testified before the 1992 Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs

~Diminished legislation that gave oversight and protection to the families

~Dismantled protection to any future servicemen that go missing.

 
Thank you!

 ~The Measure of The Man~

Anyone who has had an adversarial relationship with John McCain will tell you that there are few with less self-control than the senator from Arizona. Many have questioned his ability to maintain a clear head in a time of crisis. For those of us who have seen these sparks of insanity from McCain, we know all too well that what lies beneath is something dark, ominous and certainly not presidential. John McCain makes reference to his service to our great nation by almost daily reminding us of his five and a half year captivity in the Hanoi Hilton. Yet few have been able to look beyond McCain, the POW, to examine his political record, as if it were taboo somehow to be critical of a former prisoner of war. But what about this former prisoner of war and his criticism of the very same people who fought to bring him home from the dark dank cell he likes to remind us about so much? - The POW/MIA Families of those less fortunate than McCain, those who still have yet to be returned to the soil they gave their lives for.

Since his return from Hanoi, McCain has …

~Ignored pleas of POW/MIA Family Members for his political influence in the overall POW/MIA Issue as well as with their individual cases

~Verbally abused POW/MIA Family Members in public and private

~Attempted to negatively influence those who testified before the 1992 Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs

~Diminished legislation that gave oversight and protection to the families

~Dismantled protection to any future servicemen that go missing.

Yes, John McCain, the American politician, the man who many think would and should be the primary advocate and activist for the POW/MIA Issue is in fact the Issue's primary adversary. You read correctly, the Issue's primary adversary. John McCain has not provided one positive contribution to these same families that fought along side the first Mrs. McCain for close to six years to bring home all of those who were known to be captured by the Vietnamese. One would think that McCain would feel almost beholden to these fine American military families who united in one of their darkest hours to keep the POW/MIA Issue in the forefront of the War in Vietnam. Yet, nothing could be further from the truth.

Cruel Encounters with McCain by POW/MIA Family Members

In the beginning, when McCain's political aspirations began to pan out at the national level, many POW/MIA families made the erroneous assumption that John McCain would be a logical ally as they still fought with the Department of Defense for answers on the fate of their loved ones. Again, nothing could be further from the truth. There are many very well known encounters between John McCain and POW/MIA family members. Here we will quickly focus on three of these encounters. The first is with the family of fellow Air Force pilot David Hrdlicka's wife Carol and Jane (Duke) Gaylord, mother of missing civilian Charles Duke.

david-hrdlicka.jpg

Col. David Hrdlicka, USAF while in captivity

A recent statement put out in January of 2008 by Mrs. Hrdlicka's attorney reads;

According to Mrs.Carol Hrdlicka, when POW/MIA family members confronted Sen. John McCain in the halls of Congress after the conclusion of the Committee's Report, he shoved the wheelchair of handicapped POW mother Jane Gaylord out of his way knocking it into her niece who was behind the chair attending to her aunt and she was pushed up against a wall. Subsequently Mrs. Gaylord filed a complaint for assault against the Senator but the matter was squelched by the powers that be. As Senator McCain attempted to jump on an elevator to make a quick escape from the POW/MIA family members gathered, he shouted at Mrs. Hrdlicka, "You don't know what I've been through"(indicating he was a former POW and inferring Mrs. Hrdlicka had no comparable experience or appreciation of his great suffering and sacrifice). As the door to the elevator began to close around the cowering Senator who was making good his get-a-way, Mrs. Hrdlicka raised a large photo of her POW husband Col. David Hrdlicka and thrust it at the elevator doors to show the Senator that she did indeed share in the suffering of POWs and family members and shouted that she had clear proof her husband David was still alive in captivity. Unfortunately, Mrs. Hrdlicka's cries and pleas for help from government officials bent on closing the chapter on POWs fell on deaf ears and blackened hearts!"

The 1991-92 Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs

victor-joe-apodaca-jr.jpg

Victor J. Apodaca, Jr., USAF

Another incident and most likely the most disturbing occurred in 1992 while McCain was an outspoken member of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs. The senator from Arizona continually interrupted, argued with and ridiculed testimony given by various governmental employees involved in the POW/MIA Issue as well as family members. In fact, he brought the sister of a missing Air Force pilot to tears during one of his confrontational rants, Dolores Apodaca Alfond. Her testimony at a hearing of the POW/MIA committee Nov. 11, 1992, was revealing. She pleaded with the committee not to shut down in two months, as scheduled, because so much of its work was unfinished. Also, she was critical of the committee, and in particular Kerry and McCain, for having "discredited the overhead satellite symbol pictures, arguing there is no way to be sure that the [distress] symbols were made by U.S. POWs." She also criticized them for similarly discounting data from special sensors, shaped like a large spike with an electronic pod and an antenna, that were airdropped to stick in the ground along the Ho Chi Minh trail. These devices served as motion detectors, picking up passing convoys and other military movements, but they also had rescue capabilities. Specifically, someone on the ground — a downed airman or a prisoner on a labor detail — could manually enter data into the sensor pods. Alfond said the data from the sensor spikes, which was regularly gathered by Air Force jets flying overhead, had showed that a person or persons on the ground had manually entered into the sensors — as U.S. pilots had been trained to do — "no less than 20 authenticator numbers that corresponded exactly to the classified authenticator numbers of 20 U.S. POWs who were lost in Laos."

Other than the panel's second co-chairman, Sen. Bob Smith, R-N.H., not a single committee member attended this public hearing. But McCain, having been advised of Alfond's testimony, suddenly rushed into the room to confront her. His face angry and his voice very loud, he accused her of making "allegations … that are patently and totally false and deceptive." Making a fist, he shook his index finger at her and said she had insulted an emissary to Vietnam sent by President Bush. He said she had insulted other MIA families with her remarks. And then he said, through clenched teeth: "And I am sick and tired of you insulting mine and other people's [patriotism] who happen to have different views than yours."

mccainmug2.jpg

One of the many faces of John McCain

By this time, tears were running down Alfond's cheeks. She reached into her handbag for a handkerchief. She tried to speak: "The family members have been waiting for years — years! And now you're shutting down." He kept interrupting her. She tried to say, through tears, that she had issued no insults. He kept talking over her words. He said she was accusing him and others of "some conspiracy without proof, and some cover-up." She said she was merely seeking "some answers. That is what I am asking." He ripped into her for using the word "fiasco." She replied: "The fiasco was the people that stepped out and said we have written the end, the final chapter to Vietnam." "No one said that," he shouted. "No one said what you are saying they said, Ms. Alfond." And then, his face flaming pink, he stalked out of the room, to shouts of disfavor from members of the audience. As with most of McCain's remarks to Alfond, the facts in his closing blast at her were incorrect. Less than three weeks earlier, on Oct. 23, 1992, in a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden, President Bush — with John McCain standing beside him — said: "Today, finally, I am convinced that we can begin writing the last chapter in the Vietnam War."

The committee did indeed, as Alfond said they planned to do, shut down two months after the hearing. It is highly recommend that you take a few moments to follow the link provided below which will take you to the Library of Congress website and the specific record of the hearings from the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs. To give you a sampling of McCain's treatment of witness who appeared before the Committee, click on the November, 1991 hearings and proceed to page 437 of the record where Mr. Tracy Ursry, the Minority Staff chief investigator for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with regard to legislative inquiries on the POW/MIA Issue, is "cross-examined" by McCain. McCain's segment begins on p. 443. After reading that portion, you will see that McCain did not sit on the Committee with an open mind but with a methodical agenda, that of giving then President Clinton the necessary cover to re-establish trade with Vietnam at the expense of the full and accurate accounting of our missing servicemen. Make no qualms about it, a few years later both McCain and Sen. John Kerry were there by design for the photo op with President Clinton when the official announcement regarding lifting the trade embargo with Vietnam was made public.

july-11-1995-mccain-kerry-clinton-lifting-embargo.jpg

Re-establishment of Trade with Vietnam at the expense of our missing men

The Truth Bill

In 1989, 11 members of the House of Representatives introduced a measure they called "The Truth Bill." A brief and simple document, it said: "[The] head of each department or agency which holds or receives any records and information, including live-sighting reports, which have been correlated or possibly correlated to United States personnel listed as prisoner of war or missing in action from World War II, the Korean conflict and the Vietnam conflict shall make available to the public all such records and information held or received by that department or agency. In addition, the Department of Defense shall make available to the public with its records and information a complete listing of United States personnel classified as prisoner of war, missing in action, or killed in action (body not returned) from World War II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam conflict." Bitterly opposed by the Pentagon, "The Truth Bill" got nowhere. It was reintroduced in the next Congress in 1991 — and again disappeared. Then, suddenly, out of the Senate, birthed by the Arizona senator, a new piece of legislation emerged. It was called "The McCain Bill." This measure turned "The Truth Bill " on its head. It created a bureaucratic maze from which only a fraction of the available documents could emerge. And it became law. So restrictive were its provisions that one clause actually said the Pentagon didn't even have to inform the public when it received intelligence that Americans were alive in captivity. First, it decreed that only three categories of information could be released, i.e., "information … that may pertain to the location, treatment, or condition of" unaccounted-for personnel from the Vietnam War. (This was later amended in 1995 and 1996 to include the Cold War and the Korean conflict.) If information is received about anything other than "location, treatment or condition," under this statute, which was enacted in December 199l, it does not get disclosed. Second, before such information can be released to the public, permission must be granted by the primary next of kin, or PNOK. In the case of Vietnam, letters were sent by the Department of Defense to the 2,266 PNOK. More than 600 declined consent (including 243 who failed to respond, considered under the law to be a "no").

Finally, in addition to these hurdles and limitations, the McCain act does not specifically order the declassification of the information. Further, it provides the Defense Department with other justifications for withholding documents. One such clause says that if the information "may compromise the safety of any United States personnel … who remain not accounted for but who may still be alive in captivity, then the Secretary [of Defense] may withhold that record or other information from the disclosure otherwise required by this section." Boiled down, the preceding paragraph means that the Defense Department is not obligated to tell the public about prisoners believed alive in captivity and what efforts are being made to rescue them. It only has to notify the White House and the intelligence committees in the Senate and House. The committees are forbidden under law from releasing such information. At the same time, the McCain act is now being used to deny access to other sorts of records. For instance, part of a recent APBnews.com Freedom of Information Act request for the records of a mutiny on a merchant marine vessel in the 1970s was rejected by a Defense Department official who cited the McCain act. Similarly, requests for information about Americans missing in the Korean War and declared dead for the last 45 years have been denied by officials who reference the McCain statute.

The 1995 Missing Service Personnel Act

In the years following the 1992 –93 Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs, the POW/MIA Community along with family members began working with concerned legislators and crafted legislation to strength their battles with the Department of Defense as they have little if any oversight from anywhere within the government when they were deceived or even outright lied to by POW/MIA agencies. Wanting to shield future military families from the pain they had suffered for close to three decades they included language that would make the reporting of an MIA more responsive. McCain, in short ordered weakened this act if not stripped it entirely making it almost worthless.

In the 1995 act, the theater commander, after receiving the MIA report, would have 14 days to report to his Cabinet secretary in Washington. His report had to " certify" that all necessary actions were being taken and all appropriate assets were being used "to resolve the status of the missing person." This section was stricken from the act in 1996 by McCain and replaced with language that made the Cabinet secretary, not the theater commander, the recipient of the report from the field. All the certification requirements also were stricken. 'Turn commanders into clerks' "This, " said a McCain memo, "transfers the bureaucracy involved out of the field to Washington." He argued that the original legislation, if left intact, " would accomplish nothing but create new jobs for lawyers and turn military commanders into clerks."

One final blow in the law was McCain's removal of all its enforcement teeth. The original act provided for criminal penalties for anyone, such as military bureaucrats in Washington, who destroy, cover up or withhold from families any information about a missing man. McCain erased this part of the law. He said the penalties would have a chilling effect on the Pentagon's ability to recruit personnel for its POW/MIA office. Well, this writer would have to questions this line of thinking as we, thankfully live in a democracy where we all are innocent until proven guilty. Therefore, these criminal penalties would have to be proven before any penalties could be enforced. Just as with anyone accused or suspected with a crime, if you are innocent and have nothing to hide, then there should be no grounds for concern. Does McCain no have faith in our federal judicial system?

gregdressblues1.jpg 

Cpl. Greg Harris, USMC

This last portion of McCain's heartless manipulation of this legislation has some present day ramifications. Case in point, that of Marine Corporal Greg Harris. During a recent meeting with the case analyst, the family has reported that they were lied to and deceived by their case analyst in an attempt to cover up a report that confirmed Harris' captivity. The report was kept from the family and reported to them in writing and again during the meeting as being hearsay information. Yet, the family had obtained the report without the knowledge of the analyst. The report clearly stated that the information was a firsthand account of Harris' capture yet the case analyst, with no fear of repercussions, knowingly lied to the family trying to pass off the contents of the report as hearsay thus belittling its value. According to family members who were present at this meeting, when the case analyst was confronted with this contradiction between "firsthand" and "hearsay" reporting, she simply replied, "Well, it says firsthand, but it doesn't mean firsthand". If McCain had not purposefully taken away the prosecutorial clause in the original Missing Service Personnel Act, the Harris case analyst would have been much less likely to lie to the family knowing the ramifications. Yet, with no oversight whatsoever, case analysts and any other government official involved with the POW/MIA Issue can do and say what they like with the knowledge that John McCain has covered their six.

Conclusion

If indeed actions do speak louder than words, then the measure of the man that is John Sidney McCain is one of questionable character. Being a former POW himself, knowing the pain and agony that his own family members and first wife went through during his captivity, how can he, in good conscience, prolong and even in some cases make more excruciating that same pain his loved ones endured? Does what has been referenced here give Americans a sigh of relief or cause for grave concern with regard to a potential McCain Presidency? Do the families of the four missing American soldiers in Iraq know how John McCain weakened their position and took control of their son's fate from those on the ground and transferred it to the political spin doctors in Washington? This is the measure of the man and he simply does not measure up.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leave No Man Behind

I received the following information from Bill Bell the co-author of Leave No Man Behind on Friday.

billbell@pinncom.com

"
Garnett "Bill" Bell went to Vietnam as an infantryman in 1965 and served multiple combat tours there.  Bell's wife and son were killed and a daughter critically injured in April 1975, when the families of U.S. officials assigned to the American Embassy in Saigon were evacuated in conjunction with the "Operation Babylift" program.  Bell returned to postwar Vietnam as the first official U.S. representative after the war ended when he was assigned as the Chief of the U.S. Office for POW/MIA Affairs in Hanoi.  Bell later became a member of the Congressional Staff, U.S. House of Representatives.  Bell is the co-author of  "Leave No Man Behind."

"Now, the first chief of the U.S. Government's only official office in postwar Vietnam provides an insider's account of that effort. The challenges he faced daily in dealing with U.S. politicians, including Vietnam veterans, Senators John McCain and John Kerry..."



Leave No Man Behind

  


 

by Garnett "Bill" Bell  

Leave No Man Behind: An eyewitness account of the Vietnam War from its early stages through the last day of the Republic, 30 April 1975. A startling new look at the postwar era and the issue of America's unreturned veterans listed as POW/MIA, an issue that has haunted America since the beginning of American involvement. Shrouded in controversy, a subject of great emotion amid charges of governmental conspiracy and Communist deceit, the possibility of American servicemen being held in secret captivity after the war's end has influenced U.S. policy toward Southeast Asia for three decades. Now, the first chief of the U.S. Government's only official office in postwar Vietnam provides an insider's account of that effort. The challenges he faced daily in dealing with U.S. politicians, including Vietnam veterans, Senators John McCain and John Kerry, are an ardent reminder of the many similarities in the bloody wars fought by American troops in both Vietnam and Iraq-Afghanistan. In an illuminating and deeply personal memoir, the government's top missing persons investigator in Southeast Asia, who later became a member of the U.S. Congressional Staff, discusses the history of the search for missing Americans, reveals how the Communist Vietnamese stonewalled U.S. efforts to discover the truth, and how the standards for MIA case investigations were gradually lowered while pressure for expanded commercial and economic ties with communist Vietnam increased. Leave No Man Behind is the compelling story of a dedicated group of professionals who, against great odds, were able to uphold the proud military traditions of duty, honor and country.

Every American fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan should read "Leave No Man Behind."

As the US Marine Corps helicopter lifted from the roof of the American Embassy in Saigon at daybreak on April 30, 1975, I thought about the carnage that would result from a heat-seeking missile fired by Vietnamese Communist forces gradually encircling the besieged capital of the dying Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  Exhausted by a lack of sleep for the previous several days, I no longer felt fear, only curiosity.  Tears welled up in my eyes, perhaps due in part to the anguish of witnessing the tragic events unfolding before me, but also from caustic smoke belched out of rooftop incinerators glowing cherry-red from reams of frantically burned secret US Government documents.  Feeling a sense of relief, I nevertheless harbored an even stronger sense of guilt. On the Republic of Vietnam's final day, as I looked down into the gradually diminishing compound and into the terrified eyes in the upturned faces of hundreds of Vietnamese nationals and citizens of other countries friendly to the United States, who were being left behind, I knew that I would be haunted for many years to come.  As the venerable "Sea Stallion"  throbbed its way through the damp morning air toward a helicopter carrier anchored off the coast at Vung Tau, blazing multicolored tracers rising from the dark-canopied jungle below bade farewell to America and to an era known as the Vietnam War. 

During the more than 30 minute flight into the future I sat angry and confused after some 10 years of involvement with a faraway place called Vietnam.  I wondered whether the sacrifices in lives and national treasure made by America had been worthwhile or in vain.  After contemplating the issue for many years, I believe it is now time to take stock of the American War in Vietnam so that Americans, especially those of us who served there, can finally decide whether or not we now have cause for a celebration or the lingering agony of defeat.

With the fall of the RVN, as many analysts had predicted, jubilant communist forces quickly invaded and occupied the populated areas.  Hundreds of thousands of former military and civilian officials were required to be screened, classified and registered as enemies of the revolution to be detained in remote, isolated concentration camps under horrific conditions.  Thousands died due to disease and malnutrition, many never to be heard from again by family members.  At the same time, the communist leadership insisted that the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the north and the Provisional Revolutionary Government in the south be united as one. 

From that day forward, according to the constitution, only one political party, the Vietnam Communist Party, would be allowed to exist.  On official letterheads of government stationery  the three previously used terms comprising the national motto of the communist north: "Freedom, Independence and Democracy" were changed forever to read "Freedom, Independence and Happiness." To the Vietnamese people this change in terminology, especially the reference to happiness,  would provide one of the few sources of humor during a desperate time.  To add insult to injury, the graves of fallen RVN military personnel were razed by bulldozers in cemeteries across the country.  Typewriters, radios, televisions and anything that could be used for propagation or communication were required to be registered with the "Military Management Committee" responsible for political security under the new "Socialist Republic of Vietnam." As interest began to wane, occasional references to the Vietnam War coined phrases such as "a noble cause" or "an unnecessary war."   The question as to whether the Vietnam War was or was not necessary was just as divisive in postwar debate as it was during the days following the 1968 "Tet Offensive." In my own assessment of both the necessity for and the outcome of the Vietnam War  two primary considerations were the U.S. national interest at the time and the mission of the U.S. Military Forces that fought in Southeast Asia. 

The overall mission of U.S. military forces for the latter part of the 20th century began to take shape shortly after the conclusion of World War II.  At that time the policy of the United States was one of containment of Communism.  I believed that this policy was fully justified, because it was obvious that the Communist International, especially Russia and China, sought to "liberate" the entire world. This policy of containment became known as the "Cold War." Although there were numerous clashes involving air crews during missions involving special operations and reconnaissance, the first major battlefield of that war erupted in 1950 on the Korean Peninsula, where the successful accomplishment of the mission of containing communism there was dubbed by the media as a "stalemate."

At the beginning of the War in Vietnam, the basic mission of  American soldier worldwide was to kill, destroy, or capture the enemy, or repel his assault by fire.  Over one million men and women answered their nation's call, and they did their level best to carry out their mission in Southeast Asia.  As a result, some 58,000 Americans and some 225,000 allied personnel made the ultimate sacrifice, while by comparison, communist Vietnam suffered the loss of over 1,300,000 personnel, including 150,000 personnel who were killed-in-action but never recovered.  I personally witnessed the strongest blow struck at communist forces by hard-fighting American and South Vietnamese troops that occurred during the January 31, 1968, "Tet" offensive.  The bodies of thousands of communist personnel were stacked in piles around installations throughout South Vietnam, and losses were so heavy for the communist side that the entire military rank structure was temporarily abandoned and cadre selected to command and control units were assigned based on position or job title only, rather than actual military rank.  The loss of life to the communist side was nothing less than staggering, and any U.S. military commander whose losses approached even a small percentage of actual communist fatalities at that time would most likely have been relieved of command and drummed from the service. 

Even though America's servicemen and women fought valiantly during the 1968 "Tet" offensive, the U.S. and international media nevertheless managed to reshape their hard-earned victory into a political defeat.  Vietnamese communist propaganda experts were so skillful that they were able to convince many members of the media and even some military analysts that two separate governments, the National Liberation Front in South Vietnam and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the North, existed side by side and that both were involved in a "civil war."  It has since been proven that both the NLF and the DRV were tightly controlled by the Vietnam Communist Party and both governments were actually one and the same.  Moreover, personnel of the two purported military organizations of both illusionary governments, the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and the Viet Cong (VC), were in reality members of the Peoples Army of Vietnam (PAVN).

Admittedly, in terms of national treasure the Vietnam War was not cheap.  Depending on which expert's figures are used, the total cost of the Vietnam War to America was somewhere in the neighborhood of 250 billion dollars.  By comparison the overall U.S. defense budget during postwar, peacetime years exceeded that amount annually.  In reality one million men could not have been trained at U.S.-based training centers for a 10 year period, even using blank ammunition, for a lesser amount.  While the Vietnam War was certainly a drain on the U.S. economy, during the decade of our of engagement there the former Soviet Union also provided significant amounts of financial and material support to communist forces deployed throughout Southeast Asia.  Support by the USSR to Vietnam, the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan and a badly managed, centrally controlled economy all combined to bring the former Soviet Union to its knees and bring about  the collapse of the Communist Party.  Ultimately this collapse led to the end of the Cold War.  Veterans of the Cold War, especially those who fought in Korea and Vietnam, now enjoy the gratitude of the peoples of many European, East Asian and Southeast Asian nations.  It is now clear that as a result of the sacrifices made by American and allied veterans, today the people of Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and  Indonesia are living under freely elected governments. This accounts for one quarter of the earth's population. 

Obviously, the true losers of the Vietnam War are the Vietnamese people, not just the people of the former Republic of Vietnam, but citizens from all areas of the country, including the north.  Although millions of Vietnamese "voted with their feet" by escaping on small boats across dangerous ocean currents, resulting in staggering losses to mankind, today millions more freedom-loving Vietnamese still yearn to be free.  I believe that the two most important bilateral issues remaining between the U.S. and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam are an accounting for the almost 1,800 Americans still missing from the Vietnam War and democracy for the Vietnamese people. 

Successive administrations in Washington, D.C. have pressed for democracy in many countries around the world, including Russia, Haiti, South Africa, Afghanistan and Iraq.  But there has been very little interest shown in gaining democracy for Asians, and this double standard is difficult to understand.  It is almost as though we Americans have a collective mentality whereby we believe that peoples with yellow skin cannot manage freedom, and that tight control is the only option available.  

The American business community, aggressively buying up cheap products manufactured in Asia for resale on the U.S. market, is blinded by the lack of labor unions, cheap wages and fear of violent reprisals against labor strikes.  It is ironic that after some 58,000 fine young Americans died in Vietnam while fighting for democracy the American business community is now steadily developing the economy of communist controlled Vietnam, insuring that the Vietnam Communist Party will not only remain in power, but that it will increasingly have the ability to maintain an even larger and more powerful military force. Concerning the plight of the families of Vietnam War POWs and MIAs, democracy can also go a long way to help in this regard.  I believe that most Americans, especially Vietnam veterans, will agree that for the most part the Vietnamese people are honest and hardworking.  Like our people right here at home, I can't imagine a situation where the people of Vietnam would be willing to hide the remains of anyone's loved one in order to extort money from them.  Although during the past 30 years the ruling communists have gradually doled out bits and pieces of skeletal remains and personal effects in return for large monetary sums, once the Vietnam Communist Party has collapsed the Vietnamese people will rise to the occasion and provide whatever assistance is necessary to resolve the issue of our missing men.  We should all be doing everything we can to make sure that day comes.


Garnett "Bill" Bell went to Vietnam as an infantryman in 1965 and served multiple combat tours there.  Bell's wife and son were killed and a daughter critically injured in April 1975, when the families of U.S. officials assigned to the American Embassy in Saigon were evacuated in conjunction with the "Operation Babylift" program.  Bell returned to postwar Vietnam as the first official U.S. representative after the war ended when he was assigned as the Chief of the U.S. Office for POW/MIA Affairs in Hanoi.  Bell later became a member of the Congressional Staff, U.S. House of Representatives.  Bell is the co-author of  "Leave No Man Behind."
 

"I knew with your involvement Leave No Man Behind would be first-rate, but Bill Bell too has an obvious gift for storytelling along with his other remarkable qualities.  What impressed me was not only the authoritative in-depth reconstruction of events but the facile, very skillful  writing.  To interweave the family history and bio with the search activities, the anecdotes with the analysis and the pen portraits of Bell's colleagues and commanders--as any author knows--is a huge challenge, one that you guys bring off brilliantly.  I  don't know how you and Bell divided the writing and the work generally, but the effort deserves high praise. I hope it finds the wider audience it deserves."

Dr. Stuart Rochester, co-author, "Honor Bound: The History of American Prisoners of War in Southeast Asia, 1961-1973"

"Leave No Man Behind" by Garnett "Bill" Bell with George J. Veith.

$24.95 U.S. at www.amazon.com or billbell@pinncom.com


The Vietnam War's POW/MIA issue has haunted America since the early stages of the war. Shrouded in controversy, a subject of great emotion amid charges of governmental conspiracy and Communist deceit, the possibility of American servicemen being held in secret captivity after the war's end has influenced U.S. policy toward Southeast Asia for three decades. Now, the first chief of the U.S. POW/MIA office in postwar Vietnam provides an insider's account of that effort, as well as a detailed account of the final days of the Republic of Vietnam in April 1975. In an illuminating and deeply personal memoir, the government's top POW/MIA field investigator discusses the history of the search for missing Americans, reveals how the Communist Vietnamese stonewalled U.S. efforts to discover the truth, and how the standards for MIA case investigations were gradually lowered while pressure for expanded commercial and economic ties with communist Vietnam increased. Leave No Man Behind is the compelling story of one man's quest, at great individual cost, to find the truth about America's missing in action from the Vietnam War.


"The most comprehensive study of our government's efforts to account for our POW/MIAs from the Vietnam War I have read to date. Bill Bell and Jay Veith have done a masterful job with a very personal subject, recounting these efforts in an objective and straight forward manner. I highly recommend this book for anyone wishing a greater understanding of the POW/MIA issue."
--Rod Utech
Producer, POW/MIA Radio


Subject: Leave No Man Behind

Mr. Veith-

I just spoke to Stuart Rochester and he gave me your contact info.  I gave a lecture last week at the University of Maryland on POW/MIA issues of the Vietnam War.  I have done this several times before and I usually contact Stuart for last minute suggestions or current information I can share with the class.

I met with Stuart last week and he let me borrow some video material and his copy of "Leave No Man Behind."  I have read about half of the book and would like to order a copy.  Can you let me know how to order the book?  I tried Alibris, but they do not have it listed yet.

I have been interested in POW/MIA issues for many years and was very involved in the resubmission of the Medal of Honor for Rocky Versace as well as in the building of the Rocky Versace Plaza and Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Alexandria, Va.

"Code Name Bright Light" and "Leave No Man Behind" are tremendous contributions to the telling of the Vietnam POW/MIA story.  Thank you and Mr. Bell for the great work you have done for our country, and for the memories of many lost in the Vietnam War.

Sincerely,

Mike Faber

Founding Member, The Friends of Rocky Versace

Honorary Member, West Point Class of 1959

(703) 764-3300 (w)

(703) 898-6389 (cell phone)

 

Editorial Reviews

Rod Utech, Producer, POW/MIA Radio

"The most comprehensive study ... to account for our POW/MIAs from the Vietnam War I have read to date."

About the Author

Garnett "Bill" Bell was the first chief of the U.S. POW/MIA office in post-war Vietnam. Since his enlistment in the U.S. Army in 1960 to his retirement in 1993, Bill Bell played a vital role in the history of the American POW/MIA issue. In 1973, Bell was chosen as the American interpreter-translator for "Operation Homecoming," the release of U.S. POWs in Hanoi by the North Vietnamese and Pathet Lao. During the fall of South Vietnam in 1975, Bell helped clandestinely evacuate American and South Vietnamese nationals from Saigon, and was one of the last American officials to leave by helicopter. In 1988, he became the U.S. Government's field investigator for the first POW/MIA search and recover operations undertaken in post-war Vietnam. George J. Veith has written countless pages about the Vietnam War, including "Code Name Bright Light: The Untold Story of U.S. POW Rescue Efforts during the Vietnam War" (Military Book Club's Book of the Month for January, 1998). He has testified before the U.S. House of Representatives on the POW/MIA issue and has been interviewed on radio and TV on behalf of the families of POW/MIAs.

Product Description:

"Leave No Man Behind" is the powerful story of Garnett "Bill" Bell's quest, at great personal cost, to find and bring home the POWs and MIAs of the Vietnam War. With his encyclopedic knowledge of the Vietnamese Communists and his fluency in various regional dialects, he penetrated the system the Communists had created to exploit American POWs for diplomatic concessions, or their remains and personal effects for financial rewards. In this book, Bell shares his perspective as a witness to history as it unfolded.

 

 


The Author Is A Hero!, December 19, 2004



Reviewer:

Mcgivern Owen L (NY, NY USA) -  




"Leave No Man Behind" is the true guidepost to the painful saga of resolving the search for POWs and MIAs in Indochina. It should be required for anyone interested in the details and history of the quest.! The author, a genuine hero, spent most of 20 years, 1973-1993, interviewing refugees, battling U.S. bureaucrats (military and civilian) and wrestling with Communist officials in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. He was also this country's senior field investigator, searching remote crash and burial sites for remains of U.S. military. Along the way he was actively involved in the final evacuation from Saigon in 1975. He learned several distinct Vietnamese dialects, the better to communicate/negotiate with the adversary. Few Americans would be that conscientious. Those of us who have followed and supported the search for POWs/MIAs all these years know how venally, dishonestly and even cruelly the Vietnamese have acted. They deny storing remains and then repatriate bodies with obvious evidence of chemical storage. They allow us to "investigate" crash sites that have been clearly sanitized in advance. Bodies are dug up, moved and re-interred. After payment of search fees, permits, excavation fees and other "costs", remains are found! And so it goes, on and on, year after frustrating year. But when Vietnamese act that way, they are being themselves! How can we explain or describe American officials, civilian and military, who descend to the same level? Mr. Bell makes it perfectly clear that a POW assignment was all too often a just soft "REMF" job. These guys did not want too many POWs being repatriated all at once. How would that look? The longer the searches went on, the longer the comfortable gigs. In the words of a previous reviewer, the whole deal was nothing more than a meal ticket. This reviewer has always suspected that we were own worst enemy and the list of "usual suspects" is long and sickening. There is no doubt in this quarter that these quislings would never want any American MIA found alive. They would be too frightened to explain the reappearance! One specific suspect on the list of lowlife Americans is President Carter, who tried very hard to underfund the original search efforts and nip them in the very bud. Another is not President Clinton but John Kerry. He was so in love with normalizing relations with North Vietnam that his so-called Senate Select Committee swept whitewashed the entire POW/MIA effort. All so his family owned company received exclusive American rights to real estate deals in North Vietnam. How Mr. Bell kept his calm and perspective dealing with so man cowardly and selfish Americans is a mystery. This review could continue at great length, but I'm sure my amazon friends have the picture clearly. In a review of Bernard Fall's "Street Without Joy", this observer closed by writing that the author would be "a great guy to have a few beers with". I feel the same about Mr. Bell except that he would not have to pay for a round. The author is a true American hero. I'll conclude this review by restating that "Leave No Man Behind" is required reading for anyone concerned with the resolution of the 1,845 men still missing in Indochina.





A cause, a vocation, a career?, July 3, 2004



Reviewer:

R. ARANT "toun" (Lanesville, Indiana USA) 
  




Whether or not a reader has the same take on the history of the POW-MIA issue as Bill Bell, most will be able to acknowledge that he took the issue to heart in a very active way. His commitment to the study of the languages of the region set him head and shoulders above the vast majority of NCOs and certainly all of the officers who were assigned to work the issue, and those linguistic skills for the most part served him very very well. Unfortunately, by the time Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia began to open up and the many years of almost hopeless interviews in refugee camps came to an end, the "issue" had devolved into a series of highly-publicized scams and silly bureaucratic turf struggles between bureaucracies with no missions, and inevitably was exploited by the odd politician or three. We ended up not serving the missing or their families as well as the naive among us would have expected. What was once a sacred cause degenerated into a comfortable meal ticket for many of those "involved," but in spite of all that, Bill often took stances which he knew would bring him his fair share of abuse. If anyone made an honest effort for an extended period of years, Bill did. Those that have hung on for decades sitting idle at the trough have much to answer for. Bill Bell was active in the pursuit of his life-defining mission, and that alone makes his writing worth our time and our respect.


 

From: Amorosi

Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 7:44 PM

 

Subject: please, read

 I am finally finishing Bill Bell's book.  For a comprehensive look at the POW/MIA issue, you owe it to yourself to read Leave No Man Behind by Bill Bell with George J. Veith.  Buy it, borrow it, or check it out at the library. But, please, read it.  The struggles of the past are alive and well now.  Ask Keith Maupin's family. 

Don Amorosi VVA 79

I enjoyed the book.  There are certain happenings in the book that I was personally involved in.  As example, during TET, when the missionaries were captured and or killed, I photographed the graves and the houses.  I knew them and of course am still in contact with my friend Mike Benge.  The unit I was assigned to performed many searches for them but to no avail.  Also have many pictures during TET in the Banmethuot area. 

Take care and thanks again,     Jack Jarnigan, Hilltop Lakes, Texas

Bill:
 
I just finished the book you sent me, "Leave No Man Behind". Thank you for
writing it and for so kindly sending me an autographed copy. I will treasure it
always and request that my son read it upon his return from Afghanistan this
April.
 
I hope all is well with you and your family out there in Arkansas and that you
have a blessed Christmas.
 
Your book is chock full of facts and information, much of which I have read
nowhere else, obviously because so much of it came from your professional
work and personal life.
 
With your permission, I will quote the book from time to time in what I write.
 
It is apparent to me that your perspective is one that can be found nowhere
else and that you are the one American who, as an instrument of our gov't,
did more to resolve this issue than anyone else. That is not to say that you
did not have some very good men working with you, as you so aptly pointed
out.
 
Bill, I salute you, and I want to thank you for doing the best you could possibly
do to find our missing men. It is a hard thing to admit that our nation's leaders
are more concerned with power, politics, personal legacies, and money, than
in doing the right thing. That is why I got involved in this issue and made it a
mission to personally educate as many as will listen to what I have to relate.
This is a travesty the likes of which parallel the murders of Stalin, Mao, Hitler,
Pot, and all the rest in my humble opinion.
 
Why do we do it? Why do we continue to serve knowing that our sons could
be the next Matt Maupin, Scott Speicher, William P. Milliner, or Roger Dumas?
It is amazing that our spirit is not completely crushed.
 
I mean it when I say you are a Great American Bill and I salute you. It isn't often
that a man has an opportunity to do something as important and necessary as
what you did and it isn't often that when confronted with that opportunity a man
of integrity steps up to the plate.
 
From the bottom of my heart, thank you.
 
Jeff "Mario" Smith
Guerilla Reporter
Task Force Omega of KY
859-433-9694c
2 Chronicles 7:14 (KJV)
"Your American dreams come purchased by the nightmares of a few."
--David Scott
 

From a press release by the publisher.

Goblin Fern Press is pleased to announce that our book "Leave No Man Behind"
has been selected as a finalist for ForeWord Magazine's National Book of the
Year award in Biography. This is a very prestigious award as it comes from
the one of the most respected pre-publication publicity and review magazines
in the book industry.

Congrats to Bill Bell and Jay Veith co-authors of the book.

For those of you who haven't read the book it's about Bell's over 30 years
as a soldier and civilian looking for live soldiers in Vietnam, and
repatriating the remains of those who died. In the book the authors reveal
the myriad ways in which Bell tried to systematize the investigation of lost
planes and loss incidents, only to be thwarted in his efforts by the
government of North Vietnam and sadly, our own government.  In order to
conduct his investigations, Bell learned several Asian languages ! and
dialects so as not to rely on a translator/interpreter.  This is a
fascinating, detailed, life of a courageous man who truly lived the motto
"Leave No Man Behind."

This book isn't just for the soldier, student, or history buff. It's also
for the average American who should know more about the Vietnam War, how
people in our CURRENT government felt and behaved then, and how the war in
Iraq really is similar. The book is available at:

www.amazon.com  or billbell@pinncom.com



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John McCain: A Poster Boy for Democrats and Viagra

In the rare case of McCain’s hero image lasting longer than four hours, readers should seek immediate medical attention.

From McCain’s lackluster record at the Naval Academy to his self-important tenure as a United States Senator, John McCain has an eerie history of enlarging himself. Unfortunately, leadership is not about the size of one’s election. It’s about character, competence, and respect. 

Read more.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Marine Corps of Public Education

The Marine Corps’ mystique entices motivated recruits. Its battlefield ferocity strikes fear in the hearts of its enemies. The Corps is something nearly everyone admires, but only a few have what takes to make the commitment.

Read more...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Public Education Fears Competition

My  Townhall article today targets one of public education's biggest fears -- competition.  For some reason the end of my article was chopped off. I finished that sentence in the article's comments.

 Sound off on the issue.  Link to article: <<townhall.com/columnists/LeeCulpepper/2008/01/09/the_edge>>
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A God Given Purpose Named Shrek

My students would have never guessed how God would use Shrek to strengthen my relationship with them.

The Monday before Thanksgiving, Shrek was alive and happy. His day began with a walk through the woods and around a pond that we called his swamp. Strangers always recognized how the green-cartoon ogre had inspired his name.

Shrek was a happy and handsome English bulldog -- well, he thought he was handsome anyway. His massive chest, narrow keister, and chubby-round head truly brought the cartoon ogre to life.

The relationship between man and dog is interesting. And God clearly has a plan for everything. I would have never imagined, however, that God would choose a 57-pound, white English bulldog to teach me so much about the value of patience and composed leadership.

As a former wrestler and Marine, I understood how controlled aggression, as well as an austere demeanor, could serve as an asset in certain situations. Even as a high school English teacher, those qualities proved useful when reprimanding a student lacking self-discipline or respect for authority. However, in dealing with a strong-headed English bulldog, an aggressive nature served only to exacerbate conflicts involving Shrek’s incredibly stubborn determination. 

Through trial and error, I eventually discovered that a quiet and austere character could always defuse Shrek’s worst acts of defiance. But by failing to control my frustration or anger, I exposed a weakness. This little bulldog instinctively recognized my failing, and he would become embolden to behave even worse than when the confrontation began. A bulldog’s tenacity is something to admire, but it will certainly test any human being’s resolve and character.

Surprisingly, working with Shrek helped me to mature as a leader and a teacher. Shrek galvanized a dog’s lesson about leadership that most importantly applies to people, too: people do not follow someone else because they merely like that person; we feel compelled to follow someone because we respect and admire that person. Our conduct is what commands respect from others. Losing our self-control is a surefire way to lose the respect of those who depend on us.

As much as they deny it, teenagers are searching for leadership. And leaders are obligated to inspire others to attempt tackling goals that individuals wouldn’t ordinarily attempt on their own. Amazingly, Shrek helped me become a more composed leader. He was not going to behave himself without a composed-patient influence. My students responded well to the same approach.

Shrek had a knack for making people laugh and grin.  He had mastered this undertaking so well that he could even do it when he was asleep or behaving badly, just like some children. Simply looking at Shrek’s wrinkled face, protruding teeth, and oversized-crinkled tongue made people happy. His obnoxious snoring and deep breathing were uniquely comforting, too. Most of all, his tenacious spirit would have made Winston Churchill smile.

Sadly though, Shrek died that Monday afternoon. His departure caught us off guard, as he had shown no signs of aging. Ironically, the little dog that we loved so much passed away the same day that a disgraced Michael Vick began servi